Skip to content
Back to blog
AI|Alexander Rydberg Ling

The Most Common Mistake Companies Make When Starting with GEO

The Most Common Mistake Companies Make When Starting with GEO

Many companies believe GEO is simply about producing more content. But the most common mistake is not understanding how AI engines actually choose their sources. AI prioritizes authoritative, well-structured, and fact-based content over volume. In this article, we explain why quality, structure, and credibility matter more than quantity, and how to avoid the trap most companies fall into.

The Most Common Mistake Companies Make When Starting with GEO

Many companies hear about Generative Engine Optimization and immediately start producing more content. They publish blog post after blog post, hoping that sheer volume will increase their chances of being cited by AI engines. This is the most common mistake, and it almost always leads to wasted resources and disappointing results. Understanding why this approach fails, and what to do instead, is essential for any company serious about AI visibility.

Why Volume Alone Does Not Work

Traditional SEO rewarded consistent publishing. The more pages you had targeting relevant keywords, the more opportunities you had to rank. GEO works differently. AI engines do not scan the web in real time for every query. They rely on training data and retrieval systems that prioritize quality, structure, and authority over quantity. Publishing ten mediocre articles on the same topic will not help you. One exceptionally well-structured, authoritative piece is far more likely to be cited.

The fundamental shift is this: AI engines are not looking for the most content. They are looking for the best answer. If your content does not provide a clear, comprehensive, and well-sourced response to a specific question, it will not matter how many posts you publish. AI models evaluate content on its ability to serve the user's query directly, not on how much you have published overall.

Consider this analogy. In traditional SEO, you could cast a wide net with many pages targeting different keyword variations. In GEO, you need to be the single best answer for each specific question. Breadth of coverage matters less than depth and precision on the topics you choose to address.

What Companies Should Focus On Instead

The companies that succeed with GEO take a quality-first approach. They identify the specific questions their target audience asks, then create content that answers those questions more thoroughly and accurately than anything else available. Here is what that looks like in practice:

  • Research the questions AI engines are being asked in your industry using tools and manual testing.
  • Analyze the current AI-generated answers and identify where they fall short or provide incomplete information.
  • Create content that fills those gaps with specific, data-backed information and original insights.
  • Structure your content with clear headings, definitions, and concise paragraphs that AI can easily parse.
  • Include original research, proprietary data, or expert quotes that competitors cannot easily replicate.
  • Focus on being the definitive resource for your specific niche rather than covering a broad range of topics superficially.

The Authority Trap

Another dimension of this mistake is underestimating how much AI engines value authority signals. Being cited on other reputable websites, having your experts quoted in industry publications, and maintaining a consistent presence on authoritative platforms all contribute to how AI models assess your credibility. Companies that focus only on their own blog miss the broader ecosystem of signals that influence AI citations.

Building authority takes time, but it compounds. Every guest article, podcast appearance, industry report, and conference presentation adds to your digital footprint in ways that AI models can recognize and reward. Think of your authority-building efforts as a network of signals that reinforce each other. The more places where credible sources reference your expertise, the more likely AI engines are to treat you as a trustworthy source.

The Technical Structure Trap

Many companies also overlook the technical aspects of GEO. They produce great content but fail to structure it in a way that AI engines can efficiently process. This includes neglecting schema markup, using vague headings that do not match common query patterns, and burying key information deep within long paragraphs. Technical optimization is not glamorous, but it is often the difference between content that gets cited and content that gets overlooked.

A Better Starting Point

If you are just getting started with GEO, begin with a focused audit rather than a content blitz. Identify your five to ten most important topics. Evaluate your existing content on those topics. Improve the structure, depth, and sourcing of what you already have before creating anything new. This approach is more efficient, more sustainable, and far more likely to produce meaningful results in AI-generated search.

The companies that win at GEO are not the ones that publish the most. They are the ones that provide the best answers, supported by genuine expertise and structured in a way that AI engines can easily understand and cite. Start small, focus on quality, and build from a position of strength.

Want to learn more?

We are happy to help you grow with data-driven marketing and growth hacking.

Contact us